There is not one single immediate thing doing change
Mar. 28th, 2026 04:52 pmThings happen over a long term.
Things that look at the time like a failure or even a disaster may be sowing seeds or releasing spores and having an impact that will go on.
Or even have a counter-intuitive impact at the time: okay, The Well of Loneliness got convicted for obscenity in 1928 but 1000s of women realised they were not alone just from reading the reports in the newspapers, and 1000s of them wrote to Radclyffe Hall.
Just because something does not endure does not endure does not mean it had no influence.
Am currently reading book by a friend which makes quite a thing of long-term impact of small obscure organisations of early C20th I worked on.
Was a piece in Guardian Saturday today which doesn't appear to be yet online which was doing the ever-recurrent WO about 'I see no feminists' and I wonder what they expect them to look like and perhaps they are supposing something flashy and dramatic, which can be appropriate at times. But the work is not necessarily drawing attention to itself.
Further thought: I was a bit irked to see this: Lifeline is both a musical following Alexander Fleming’s discovery of the first antibiotic and a warning about the threat of superbugs in the present day, because the Fleming narrative erases the immense amount of work that Florey, Chain and Heatley had to put in to make pencillin actually viable.





