Imperial College, rape culture and what to do about going to Picocon?

[major_clanger]

On Friday the newspaper of Imperial College Union, Felix, published a 'humour' piece. That article apparently never appeared in the online edition - which now leads with an apology for it - but you can see a picture of it here. As the Telegraph puts it,

Cook up Rohypnol to get laid, student paper jokes

I am disgusted with this, and I'm not alone, as this post and this post from my f-lists make clear. I will be writing not only to the ICU President but also to the Rector and the head of alumni relations to express my extreme displeasure and ask what measures are being taken to punish those responsible for this piece and to ensure that such material is never published in Felix again.

But I now have another problem. Next weekend is Picocon, the annual mini-convention of IC Science Fiction Society. My first Picocon was in 1987 and I was looking forward to my 25th anniversary of what was in fact my first convention and to meeting many of my friends there. But Picocon is held at Imperial College Union and the social side of it centres on the student bar at ICU.

I appreciate that ICSF, whilst part of ICU, cannot be held responsible for what Felix does. And the membership fee for Picocon will be spent in ways that benefit ICSF and its members (funding the guest, triciasullivan and buying books for the ISCF library) rather than going to ICU. But ICU will benefit from the use of the bar by attendees at Picocon. It doesn't seem right to me to take on ICU for its misconduct and then help boost its bar profits.

Looked at like that, the solution seems fairly clear. Having discussed the matter with darth_hamster, who shares my views, we will attend Picocon, albeit with rather uncomfortable feelings as to the venue. But we won't buy anything to eat or drink from ICU. We will either invite friends to join us in one of the local pubs (the Queen's Arms is a likely choice) or, if we are in the student bar at any point, we will drink only tap water.

Comments

[major-clanger.livejournal.com]

Imperial College is, I'd suggest, in an odd position; it is very male-dominated, and although this is not to the extent it was when I was an undergraduate (some 85%) most undergraduates are still male. In my time there was certainly an odd combination of academic excellence with what I can only call a 'rugger-bugger' culture. Without excusing it one iota, this may explain why there could be a mindset that not only allows this piece to be written - there are always idiots - but lets it through to be published. As you've pointed out, the apology is very half-hearted; it should, in very abject terms, be explaining how wrong the piece was, how stupid it was to allow it to be published, and above all what damage might be caused by in any way encouraging the view that this was appropriate behaviour.

Unless Imperial has changed a lot since I was there, it has a lot of rather socially-inept young men who find it difficult to even get to know a woman. I know; that was me, once. In a student body of several thousand, even if only a very small fraction of these are nudged towards thinking that just maybe getting a woman very drunk (let alone resorting to sedatives) would get them somewhere, the result could be very bad.

[penguineggs.livejournal.com]

Yes. And as this survey shows there's already enough confusion about whether alcohol- and drug-induced incapacity really "counts" among the relevant demographic as it is.


One point I've been trying to make is that there's two factors in play, here; the first is the incident in itself, which is bad enough, and the second is how it's being dealt with by the institution, which is early days but still not good - no comment from ICU in the Telegraph piece, a very poor non-apology from the Editor and so on. The brand management is dreadful so far.

[penguineggs.livejournal.com]

Actually, the apology including the word "rape" might have helped, come to think of it.