major_clanger: Clangers (Royal Mail stamp) (Default)
[personal profile] major_clanger
On Friday the newspaper of Imperial College Union, Felix, published a 'humour' piece. That article apparently never appeared in the online edition - which now leads with an apology for it - but you can see a picture of it here. As the Telegraph puts it,

Cook up Rohypnol to get laid, student paper jokes

I am disgusted with this, and I'm not alone, as this post and this post from my f-lists make clear. I will be writing not only to the ICU President but also to the Rector and the head of alumni relations to express my extreme displeasure and ask what measures are being taken to punish those responsible for this piece and to ensure that such material is never published in Felix again.

But I now have another problem. Next weekend is Picocon, the annual mini-convention of IC Science Fiction Society. My first Picocon was in 1987 and I was looking forward to my 25th anniversary of what was in fact my first convention and to meeting many of my friends there. But Picocon is held at Imperial College Union and the social side of it centres on the student bar at ICU.

I appreciate that ICSF, whilst part of ICU, cannot be held responsible for what Felix does. And the membership fee for Picocon will be spent in ways that benefit ICSF and its members (funding the guest, [profile] triciasullivan and buying books for the ISCF library) rather than going to ICU. But ICU will benefit from the use of the bar by attendees at Picocon. It doesn't seem right to me to take on ICU for its misconduct and then help boost its bar profits.

Looked at like that, the solution seems fairly clear. Having discussed the matter with [personal profile] darth_hamster, who shares my views, we will attend Picocon, albeit with rather uncomfortable feelings as to the venue. But we won't buy anything to eat or drink from ICU. We will either invite friends to join us in one of the local pubs (the Queen's Arms is a likely choice) or, if we are in the student bar at any point, we will drink only tap water.

Date: 2012-02-12 12:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
Is it right for Felix to have editorial independence?

If Felix rightly has editorial independence, how should that be rightly monitored & appropriately subjected to sanction?

Date: 2012-02-12 12:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] major-clanger.livejournal.com
I would say this: ICU should not be able to tell Felix what or what not it can print. But that is a separate issue from the one of whether students who publish material in Felix should be held responsible for it, or even whether the editor of Felix should be subject to sanction if he or she allows publication which is unlawful, defamatory or grossly offensive.

Date: 2012-02-12 01:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com
'whether students who publish material in Felix should be held responsible' - is an interesting point, given that this article was anonymous. Attempts to force the editor to reveal who it is then start encroaching on issues of protecting sources. While the current case is hardly equivalent, past Felix editors have form on this one...

If what is published is unlawful, then clearly the editor is subject to sanction - as would be any editor.

Date: 2012-02-12 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] major-clanger.livejournal.com
By an odd coincidence, I got a contact request on LinkedIn from Bill Goodwin only this week. I do hope he doesn't need a lawyer again...

(For those not Imperial graduates, Felix Editor in 1988-89 was Bill Goodwin, later of Goodwin v United Kingdom fame amongst lawyers and journalists.)

Profile

major_clanger: Clangers (Royal Mail stamp) (Default)
Simon Bradshaw

January 2022

S M T W T F S
      1
23 45678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 10:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios