Regarding the recent controversy over the closure of the bridge from New Orleans to Gretna, someone who faxed the Mayor of Gretna to express his disapproval apparently got a response.
(An interesting note: it seems Rob got the call because he sent a fax rather than an email, and this was thus taken more seriously. This isn't the first case I've heard of this.)
Also, former NO resident
bridget_coila (apparently an SF writer who's done some convention panels - anyone met her?) comments about the coverage of this issue.
I'm not saying I endorse these points of view. But I do have to be honest and say that whilst it sounds as if there was an awful screw-up and a lot of bad decision-making, I have been feeling increasingly uncomfortable about some of the assumptions about what went on that nobody seems to question. (In particular, a look at a map suggests that Gretna is in not on the way out of NO to anywhere other than further down the Mississippi delta - it's to the south-east of the city. From all the comments I'd seen, I'd been imagining it was on the mainland side.)
What we need is some sort of investigation into what the hell went on, and why someone was apparently telling people in NO that there were non-existent buses over that bridge. (The cynical part of me wonders if someone was trying to get people not so much to safety as to somewhere outside their area of responsibility). Here, we could have a judicial review of a local government decision; does anyone know if there is an equivalent US process.
(An interesting note: it seems Rob got the call because he sent a fax rather than an email, and this was thus taken more seriously. This isn't the first case I've heard of this.)
Also, former NO resident
I'm not saying I endorse these points of view. But I do have to be honest and say that whilst it sounds as if there was an awful screw-up and a lot of bad decision-making, I have been feeling increasingly uncomfortable about some of the assumptions about what went on that nobody seems to question. (In particular, a look at a map suggests that Gretna is in not on the way out of NO to anywhere other than further down the Mississippi delta - it's to the south-east of the city. From all the comments I'd seen, I'd been imagining it was on the mainland side.)
What we need is some sort of investigation into what the hell went on, and why someone was apparently telling people in NO that there were non-existent buses over that bridge. (The cynical part of me wonders if someone was trying to get people not so much to safety as to somewhere outside their area of responsibility). Here, we could have a judicial review of a local government decision; does anyone know if there is an equivalent US process.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 06:52 am (UTC)Apparently "west" and "east" are used in a sort of whole-river sense -- Gretna is SE of New Orleans but on the west bank.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 10:34 am (UTC)I think that what happened was shocking. But it does seem that there is at least the possibility that it came about through a badly judged response to a crisis created by FEMA mismanagement rather than purely through a 'keep the undesireables out' attitude.
We urgently need to know more.
no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 09:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 10:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-09-19 05:46 pm (UTC)There were no buses or aid available on the Westbank at all. The evacuatioin buses were all going to the other side of the river, to New Orleans, to pick people up.
Would it have really been better to escort the people through Gretna and out into the swamps without food, water or shelter and leave them there?
My bet is, if they had done that, they would have been accused of "leaving people to die in the swamp."
B