![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I saw a link to this on Facebook, accompanied by some unflattering comments about Pope Francis seemingly having anti-science views:
Evan as an atheist from an English Protestant upbringing I find this surprising, which is why I suspect either an inadequate translation or a significant implied context that I am missing.
Evan as an atheist from an English Protestant upbringing I find this surprising, which is why I suspect either an inadequate translation or a significant implied context that I am missing.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 09:52 am (UTC)Dialogue between faith, reason and science
242. Dialogue between science and faith also belongs to the work of evangelization at the service of peace.[189] Whereas positivism and scientism “refuse to admit the validity of forms of knowledge other than those of the positive sciences”,[190] the Church proposes another path, which calls for a synthesis between the responsible use of methods proper to the empirical sciences and other areas of knowledge such as philosophy, theology, as well as faith itself, which elevates us to the mystery transcending nature and human intelligence. Faith is not fearful of reason; on the contrary, it seeks and trusts reason, since “the light of reason and the light of faith both come from God”[191] and cannot contradict each other. Evangelization is attentive to scientific advances and wishes to shed on them the light of faith and the natural law so that they will remain respectful of the centrality and supreme value of the human person at every stage of life. All of society can be enriched thanks to this dialogue, which opens up new horizons for thought and expands the possibilities of reason. This too is a path of harmony and peace.
243. The Church has no wish to hold back the marvellous progress of science. On the contrary, she rejoices and even delights in acknowledging the enormous potential that God has given to the human mind. Whenever the sciences – rigorously focused on their specific field of inquiry – arrive at a conclusion which reason cannot refute, faith does not contradict it. Neither can believers claim that a scientific opinion which is attractive but not sufficiently verified has the same weight as a dogma of faith. At times some scientists have exceeded the limits of their scientific competence by making certain statements or claims. But here the problem is not with reason itself, but with the promotion of a particular ideology which blocks the path to authentic, serene and productive dialogue.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 11:42 am (UTC)That is certainly much more in line with what I understood Pope Francis' stance to be. As such, that makes me wonder even more whether, in the document I linked to, "curiosity" is being used in the sense of meaning scientific enquiry at all.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 11:08 am (UTC)"Curiosity, the Pope continued, impels us to want to feel that the Lord is here or rather there, or leads us to say: “But I know a visionary, who receives letters from Our Lady, messages from Our Lady”. And the Pope commented: “But, look, Our Lady is the Mother of everyone! And she loves all of us. She is not a postmaster, sending messages every day.”
and another part strikes me as more about not getting too caught up in gossip.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-28 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 11:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 01:56 pm (UTC)It's clear from context that the word he is using is describing the sense of always looking for novelty, kind of like the search for "the latest thing" and being one up on everyone else. Think of the technical term in theology, gnosticism, whose root comes from the word for knowledge but which doesn't mean "knowledge" so much as a desire to "be the one in the know."
no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 02:01 pm (UTC)And no need to make excuses for being a fan of The Kinks, although I would cite Waterloo Sunset as a more memorable work!
no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 02:18 pm (UTC)The Italian is rather more complex than the English translation makes it sound.
But what do I know? I'm a Quaker! :o)
no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 02:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-11-27 02:57 pm (UTC)Fwiw, I occasionally review historical tomes from the Dutch publishing house, Brill and some of their translations into English from other languages are ropey to say the least.
no subject
Date: 2013-11-28 04:57 am (UTC)