My comments are, of course, not just directed at you. I don't know anything about you, so cannot speculate why you might or might not care. I do know rather more about our host, and suspect that he might care - hence my comment.

As a graduate employer I'm sure you do due diligence and will, in the course of this, find that the article is in a section of Felix of minority interest attempting to be satirical, rather than presenting a documentary analysis of "the dating practices of Imperial students" and furthermore it describes anybody who attempts this as a 'waste of oxygen' and a 'fucking moron'. No - I'm not trying to defend the piece, but I am showing that selective quoting can change how it appears in both directions. (You missed the words 'satirical look at' from your quote about 'dating practices' for example.)

I'm also sure that due diligence will lead you to conclude that an institution of 20000 is not accurately represented by the contents of 5 column inches written by one idiot in one output of the student media, and that institution-wide measures, like the fact that Imperial is one of only four top rated universities in Stonewall's gay guide to universities might be a better indicator.